![](https://whaleoilbeefoct.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/blue-moon.jpg?w=1024)
Further to my previous comments about HS2 I have unearthed more pertinent facts about the debacle which continues to illustrate just how inept and corrupt are the present government and their pals. Whistleblowers concerns were ignored, and they were sacked. A personal assistant was asked to shred copies of reports showing that costs had risen to an unacceptable level putting the project and all those salaries and bonuses at risk. Following a lunch with one of the whistleblowers she was very aggressively interviewed several times, her mobile and laptop were confiscated, she was shaken and drained by these encounters which related to an innocent lunch with a friend and had to go on sick leave. She was later made “redundant”. HS2 claimed that she was interviewed as part of a whistleblower investigation and the redundancy was unrelated. 47 senior staff who objected to the way HS2 had been allowed to cover up cost overruns by the Treasury and the Department for Transport were subsequently sacked or paid off with non-disclosure agreements. Its correctly called gagging and I have been subjected to that myself.
It seems likely that even with the cancellation of the Birmingham to Manchester leg of the project it will still cost well over £100 billion at a time when millions of people are struggling to pay for basic needs like housing, food and energy. The NHS and social care are grossly underfunded, transport is already inefficient, and most people would rather see normal trains running efficiently. So, what would £100 billion pounds buy if used properly? 200 new hospitals, 10,000 new schools, 1 million new council houses or it would pay for 270,000 nurses for ten years. Who in their right minds would choose to spend it on a railway that will get a few wealthy people from London to Birmingham 20 minutes quicker?
Why does it cost us so much to build these projects when the rest of Europe can do it for a fraction of the cost? HS2 will cost £396 million per mile, it will make it the most expensive railway project in the world. It is 8 times the cost per mile of the new French high-speed line from Tours to Bordeaux. The only other country with similar costs to us is the US!! Obviously, part of the reason is corruption and backhanders to all concerned and overpaid management jobs for the boys, it is all part of the mire of corruption and patronage that we must wade through to get anything done. As a result, not only do we have to pay vastly more to get anything built but it means that we get less built than we otherwise could. Crossrail 2 in London has been put on hold, it would have cost at least £30 billion. If we were working at Scandinavian costs it would be possible to build 4 Crossrail equivalents for less than a quarter of that cost.
Another factor here is planning permission and I have come up against that myself; the whole process is grossly inefficient, labyrinthine, and again involves jobs for the boys especially expensive lawyers. Infrastructure projects in Europe ensure that planning criteria have been set out in advance. Once the planning authorities have identified that a project meets the rules it is accepted with no possibility of later revisions. Our system does not consider adverse effects in advance, they are dealt with as the plan evolves by lawyers so it gets expensive very fast. The sheer number of legal points that have to be considered slow the whole planning process down especially as the rules are often not very clear or the government guidance is out of date. This leaves the whole process open to judicial challenge from disgruntled residents. Our electoral system doesn’t help, with local MP’s fearing a backlash from local residents in their consistency, the rest of Europe has proportional representation so does not have this problem.
There is also a lack of people with the necessary skills to oversee a project. There has been a tendency to scrap the engineering capacity in the civil service and rely on outside consultants. Other European countries have civil servants with engineering backgrounds. Then there is the technical nature of the train itself, HS2 is 20mph faster than the HGV. Getting that extra 20mph raises the costs out of all proportion to the benefits of the extra speed which in our relatively short distances is negligible. One can’t help but wonder if it was all down to someone’s ego that our fast train had to be a bit faster than the French fast train?